Reaching across the aisle

Bipartisanship! Cooperation! The olive branch of friendship!

For some reason I’m now getting emails from the Republican Committee of Allegheny County, I guess because I’m such an influential member of the Pittsburgh media.

Their update is called “The Weekly Trunk,” because it sounds better than “Elephant Droppings.”

In this week’s installment, we learn that America is a Christian nation “as established by our founding fathers,” and people in “other parties” are working to “destroy” this country “because they are traitors.”

The USA is under attack by people who live here but hate our Country. You can do something about it. It’s simple, GET OUT AND VOTE REPUBLICAN!

I’ll go out on a limb and say that this message is not atypical from what Republican Party committees across the United States are sending to their members — members of the Democratic Party are not just wrong or dumb, they are TRAITORS who want to DESTROY OUR COUNTRY.

It’s certainly the message pushed 24 hours a day on talk radio and cable TV.

Remember that when “sensible centrists” tell you Democrats should be listening to Republicans and “reaching across the aisle” to them.

Anyway, here’s the whole thing.

Am I M-I-A, or am I in Miami?

I’m sure these two news items are not related.

Also, I just fell off of a turnip truck:

And they tell me it’s swell in Miami
Spell Miami and then
Ask me why, am I
Whoa, M-I-A-am I
Feelin’ bad oh man, I can’t believe it
The fun I’vе had and I’m gonna have to leave it

I’ll go back up to Tarrytown and tеll the bagel ranch
I’ve found a good location for another branch
It’s right inside a hotel
In Miami
Spell Miami and then
Ask me why, am I
M-I-A-am I
In heaven, or am I in Miami?

Do-it-yourself corner: A pile of shed

If you follow me on social media, you know that over the past few weekends I’ve been building a new garden shed in the back yard. We already had a shed, but it’s full, and we also still have a lot of stuff in the garage that would be handier outside.

In the interest of public service, here’s what I’ve learned. For the record, the kit is a 9-by-12.5 feet “Lifetime” brand shed from Costco.

The instructions leave a lot to be desired, and the instructional videos really are misleading. They show two people snapping these sheds together like Lego bricks, and it’s a lot more complicated than that.

You absolutely need a perfectly level, square platform. I built a “skid” platform on concrete blocks, which themselves are sitting on gravel and sand beds.

If you try to put one of these sheds on uneven ground, it is never going to go together, and you are going to be in a world of hurt. Even a concrete patio might not be level enough.

I mean flat and level. If you use wood, don’t go cheap. Get pressure-treated wood rated for ground contact, and try not to get those warped and bowed boards they sell at Home Depot or Lowe’s. Order them from a real lumberyard, if possible.

There was a lot of fiddling necessary to get the parts to fit; the walls are held to the base by giant snap-tabs. (Remember building a “snap-fit” plastic model kit as a kid? Same idea.) The plastic has almost no “give” or flexibility; it’s the same type of resin that heavy-duty children’s toys are made from. Some people suggested using a heat gun to warm up the tabs enough to slide them together. I used a big hammer, a wood block and a lot of swearing.

The last time I built a shed like this, it was a metal kit from Sears, Roebuck — so it’s obviously been a hot minute. I recall the assembly being much easier than this plastic kit, although I may be misremembering. Based on Google street view, that shed is still in the yard of our old house 11 years later, though looking a little worse for wear.

With the Lifetime kit, most of the parts are held together with self-tapping sheet metal screws. Those screws are barely sufficient to hold the pieces together and it’s very easy to strip out the holes. Also, some of the holes aren’t drilled through properly, and that wasn’t the only quality control boo-boo I noticed; a bag of washers was supplied with the kit, and some of them didn’t have holes punched in them. On others, the screws wouldn’t fit through the washers. I ended up going to the hardware store and buying a bag of zinc-plated screws with built-in neoprene washers to keep moisture out.

Speaking of moisture: After the first heavy rainfall, the shed leaked, mostly around the thin plastic “skylights” in the roof. Those skylights are an odd design choice; otherwise, the roof is a fairly clever design in which the rafters double as rain gutters. The skylights are flimsy and almost guaranteed to let rain in; and they don’t provide much light to the interior anyway.

The front doors are another clever design; they come with a neat little latching mechanism and the hinges are built right into the structure of the shed itself, to make it harder for them to jimmy open or come loose.

Unfortunately, poor quality control also let the doors down; the metal rods holding the doors to the structure wouldn’t fit until I shaved them just a little bit with an angle grinder. Similarly, the metal edges of the doors — where the padlock hasp needs to be installed — were just a smidge too tight. They needed copious coaxing with some silicone lube, a mallet, a pry bar and a lot of profanity. And the instructions, once again, are not terrible clear; if you carefully follow the diagram in the instruction manual, you will be installing one of the door edges upside down, and you will have to spend a lot of time removing and reinstalling it. (Ask me how I know.)

Our old shed in the background. They now call me Jay “Two-Sheds” Thurber

So you pays your money, you takes your chance. I think we paid around $1,500 for the kit, delivered; plus I paid another $500 or so for the lumber, concrete blocks, gravel and assorted other hardware, and $9 for a bottle of Advil. For another thousand dollars, we might have gotten a pre-built wooden shed delivered. I’m not 100 percent sure the savings was worth it.

Although it’s done, I’m not putting anything into it until I can waterproof it (I’m going to caulk all of the seams) and possibly reinforce the walls with an internal wooden frame. Overall the shed feels sturdy, but the walls flex easily and I could see them buckling if someone accidentally leans on the shed, or if a tree branch strikes it during a heavy storm. If I recall correctly, the manufacturer claims you can hang objects weighing up to 30 pounds on the walls as designed; I think they’re dreaming. The flimsy plastic hooks provided in the kit will never support 30 pounds, and even if they could, the load would pull the walls apart.

My review: You get what you pay for, and this entire kit definitely feels like it was built to a price point to be sold at Costco — much like their hotdogs.

Hopefully this review helps someone else who’s considering buying one of these shed kits.

Deep political thought

I follow a lot of “never-Trump” Republicans — people like Bill Kristol, Mona Charen, Rick Wilson, Adam Kinzinger and Tom Nichols — and I subscribe to conservative publications such as The Bulwark, because I think it’s important for me to break out of a liberal/left bubble and get other perspectives.

I also find that former Republicans bring a lot of insight on what’s going on within their party, and the Trump movement. They were inside the belly of the beast, so to speak, and they saw what was happening over the past 20 years to the Republican Party as it drifted away from small-d democratic values toward authoritarianism. (In a few cases, their work helped bring about America’s transition away from three shared branches of government to an all-powerful president. Don’t forget it and don’t let them forget it.)

Still — if I were a Democratic Party candidate, I would be suspicious of any advice offered by never-Trumpers, especially on what makes a candidate “electable.”

Never-Trump Republicans, it should be noted, didn’t do a fantastic job running their own party, which is why the U.S. and the world are in the fix we’re currently in.

Put another way, would you ask the Pittsburgh Pirates for advice on how to get to the World Series?

So when never-Trump Republicans say “Abdul El-Sayed isn’t electable in Michigan” or “Zohran Mamdani is going too far in New York,” I think, “yes, but you thought Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Mitt Romney were viable candidates for the presidency.”

Maybe hit the showers and sit this one out, team.

I’m nostalgic for breathing

I remember it very clearly: I was in about the sixth grade. My best friend’s dad was driving us to school one morning and telling us about an article he’d read in Omni or Discover about the greenhouse effect, and how scary it was.

The article, he said, predicted that rising temperatures would melt the polar ice caps and change weather patterns. We could expect massive wildfires, crippling droughts and floods in places not prone to flooding.

It was terrifying thing to tell a kid. It was the kind of thing an 11-year-old kid would remember. (Although I’ve asked my friend, and he doesn’t remember it at all. But he was much more used to tuning out his dad than I was, I guess.)

I also distinctly remember thinking, “Wow! But I’m sure by the time I’m old we’ll figure something out.”

So, anyway, here we are. Instead, BP, Shell, ExxonMobil, Consol Energy, etc., etc., said “nah, we’re just going to burn the planet to cinders instead.”

It really kind of astonishing that we’ve known about whatever you want to call it — climate change, global warming, the greenhouse effect — for 40 years and all of the things that were predicted have come to pass, and the powers that be are now either shrugging and saying, “welp, too bad, what are you going to do?” or actively denying what we all can see and feel.

I sure hope someone in Silicon Valley is able to monetize this: Get fresh air shipped directly to your home each day for just $9.99! Use promo code LATESTAGECAP for 50% off your first order!

I’m not trying to be a “doomer.” There is still time to mitigate the worst effects of climate change. There has already been a big shift away from burning fossil fuels and toward solar and wind power. As the saying goes, the best time to act was 20 years ago, but the next-best time is now.

Needless to say, the President of the United States has responded to the crisis. He’s going to make a televised address to the nation tonight complaining about the 2020 election.

I think I’ll go outside and breathe deeply until I pass out from the fumes.

Words to live by

Aspiring radio DJs never ask me for advice (probably because there are very few people who aspire to be on the radio these days), but if I had one recommendation: If you’re not tired at the end of a three-hour airshift, you’re doing it wrong.

I always tell DJs, if you’re not having fun doing your show, why would you expect the listener to have fun? For my three-hour show, I’m tanked-up on caffeine and having fun. At 3:01 p.m., I collapse into a chair and just sit for a couple of minutes.

On the other hand, someone once asked the legendary Dan Ingram — who ruled the New York City radio airwaves for decades on WABC and WCBS-FM — what it took to become a successful Top 40 DJ.

The average pop record is about three minutes long. Ingram said successful DJs only had one real talent:

“You must be able to defecate in less than three minutes.”

Listen: Dan Ingram on WABC, June 1970

You can be sure, it’s more B.S.

For the first time since the 1970s, you can buy a Westinghouse air conditioner or flat-screen TV or electric blanket, but they have absolutely nothing to do with the company that used to be headquartered in Pittsburgh and employ hundreds of thousands of people, including Betty Furness.

The “Westinghouse” logo is little more than a decoration now. Companies in China make the products and importers pay a license fee to stick on a Westinghouse trademark. None of them have any connection to any appliance, radio or other equipment once made in Pittsburgh, Ohio or New Jersey, where the old Westinghouse had factories. They’re trading on nostalgia and whatever good reputation the old Westinghouse company had.

Same thing for RCA. RCA, the company that brought radio, TV, color TV and videotape recorders to the masses and pioneered in computers and satellite technology, hasn’t existed in any meaningful way since 1987. There are products labeled “RCA” in stores that run the gamut from pretty good to absolute junk. Like Westinghouse, companies pay to use the RCA trademark.

General Electric, too. The old GE company no longer exists. Products labeled “GE” are made in China by a variety of firms. Craftsman is no longer made for Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Sears’ old rival, Montgomery Ward, is just a trademark used by the mail-order company that used to be known as Fingerhut.

I was thinking about this when I heard the news that Scott Pelley had been fired by CBS News after 37 years. Pelley was terminated after he stood up to a new hatchet-person sent to takeover “60 Minutes.” The new executive producer of “60 Minutes” has almost no experience in television news and very little experience in journalism at all, but he’s a reliable boot-licker for the new owners of CBS.

What’s happening at CBS is what’s happened to all of those famous U.S. brand names that are just historic trademarks slapped on junk. There is still a “CBS Network” and there will likely still be a “60 Minutes” but what’s inside won’t be the same.

“CBS” is no more than another piece of IP — intellectual property — to be monetized and stripped of all of its value. They did it to American manufacturing; now they’re doing it to journalism. They still publish “The Washington Post,” but it’s a weak imitation of what it was; it’s just another trademark.

Lots of folks are pointing to the ideological component of the changes at CBS, which has been purchased by the hyper-wealthy Ellison family, which is an ally of the Trump administration. I think there’s an ideological component, but don’t overlook the financial component.

The new owners of CBS are ripping the wiring out of the walls to sell the copper. They’re going to monetize whatever IP they can strip. They have 90 years of CBS archives to plunder and turn into cash, after all. What’s left on the air is going to be cheap. (Take the replacement of Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show” with paid programming provided by Byron Allen. Does it remove a thorn from Trump’s side? Yes. Does it also turn an expense into revenue? Also yes.)

Ideologically, once people like Scott Pelley are chased away, “60 Minutes” and other CBS News productions are going to become a kind of half-assed, Fox News imitation, because that’s what the people in charge want to watch. But almost as importantly, it will be very, very cheap.

Sending foreign correspondents around the world to bring back stories for “60 Minutes” is expensive. Putting a bunch of talking heads in a room to yell opinions at one another is cheap.

One other thing. Did you know who owned the trademarks for the old Westinghouse Electric Corp. between 1997 and 2021?

Well, back in 1995, Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse purchased New York-based CBS Corp. But within four years, all of the traditional Westinghouse businesses had been closed or sold, and the parent corporation renamed itself CBS Corp.

That’s right: For 25 years, all of the old Westinghouse trademarks were owned by CBS.

Maybe that’s where they’re getting the idea to transform CBS, the institution, into “CBS,” the trademark — just another hollowed-out brand name, coasting on its old reputation.

You can’t have CBS without B.S.

This may seem strange, but I’ve never been the biggest fan of Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show.” I say it may seem strange, because he and I are closely aligned politically, and whenever I watched his monologues, I found myself agreeing with him virtually all the time.

And that was actually the problem. I wasn’t laughing. The jokes weren’t surprising me or challenging me. More often than not, he was just reciting a list of outrages and abuses by people in charge, and it made me angry, not happy.

But I obviously was in the minority — during President Trump’s first term, Colbert became one of his sharpest and most perceptive critics, and his ratings soared. For most of the past 10 years, “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” has dominated late-night TV; over the same period, I’ve also enjoyed watching the evolution of “Jimmy Kimmel Live” — parenthood has turned the former radio shock-jock into a real mensch. (The less I say about “The Tonight Show,” in my opinion, the better; every so often, I remember that Jimmy Fallon holds that historic job previously held by such legends as Steve Allen, Jack Paar, Johnny Carson, Jay Leno and Conan O’Brien, and I think, “Oh, something has gone terribly wrong; there must have been some kind of accident.”)

Anyway, like most people, I’ve been watching Colbert the past few weeks, and again the show has made me angry, but this time, I’ve been angry on his behalf.

Colbert is an immensely talented, smart, funny guy, and by every account I’ve seen or read, he’s more or less beloved by his staff. He’s got the Number 1 rated network late night show. He interviewed amazing guests — people at the tops of their fields in entertainment, the arts, science and politics.

There was a time, not long ago, that all of this would have spelled nothing but success. That time is past. The craven clowns who run CBS Television have kicked him to the curb. It’s enough to gag a buzzard.


CBS claims the decision is strictly financial; most observers think CBS is cowering to pressure from the Trump Administration, and especially the Trump lap-dog who chairs the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr. As I’ve noted before, Carr wears a lapel pin not in the shape of the American flag, but in the shape of President Trump’s face.

Although the FCC does not regulate television networks directly, it does regulate television station licenses, and CBS owns nearly 30 TV stations — including KDKA and WPKD in Pittsburgh. Carr has openly threatened to use the FCC to challenge the broadcast licenses of any networks that criticize the President. David Letterman called it mobster-style behavior and it should embarrass and outrage any American, conservative or liberal.

Colbert himself has noted that CBS paid the President $16 million to drop a frivolous lawsuit he filed against “60 Minutes.” Practically every lawyer — including CBS’s — thought the lawsuit would be laughed out of court. But CBS was in the process of merging with a company called Skydance Media, and it needed federal government approval, so the company paid a “settlement.” Less kind people than me might call it a “bribe.”

Literally days later, Colbert was informed that his show would not be renewed.


But I suspect CBS is not entirely lying when it says that cancelling “The Late Show” was a business decision. The program will be replaced by paid programming — essentially, an infomercial. In this case, the “paid programs” are Byron Allen’s “Comics Unleashed,” a syndicated panel talk-show about comedians, and another show called “Funny You Should Ask.”

Allen will pay CBS for the use of their network; Allen then will sell his own commercials during the shows.

This is the same model, incidentally, used on suburban Pittsburgh radio stations when you hear polkas or other ethnic programming. It’s also called “brokered content.” The host pays for the time and then sells their own commercials. The station cashes the checks and has very little risk or expense.

In other words, the CBS Television Network — many years ago, called the “Tiffany Network” for the quality of its programming — has fallen to the level of doing business like “Slappy and Happy’s Polka Jamboree” on a 1,000-watt AM radio station in Potter County, and that’s pretty damn depressing.


Over the weekend, a friend asked me, “Who the hell is going to watch Byron Allen and ‘Comics Unleashed’?”

I said, “Compared to Stephen Colbert? No one.”

He said, “Then why are they doing it?”

Here’s what I told him:

CBS claims that “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” was losing $40 million per year. Colbert and his team dispute that.

“The Late Show” averaged 2.7 million viewers per night.

Let’s say Byron Allen’s shows will only get 200,000 viewers. (“ABC World News Now,” the all-night news service carried by some ABC TV stations, gets 200,000 to 400,000 viewers, so I feel safe saying “Comics Unleashed” will get at least that many people tuning in.)

My friend said, “So they’re losing 90 percent of their audience.”

That’s correct.

Now, Byron Allen claims he’s going to pay “tens of millions of dollars” to CBS to use the time slot.

For the sake of an argument, we’ll say Allen is only paying $1 million per year, and that the “The Late Show” wasn’t losing $40 million per year, it was breaking even.

Under that scenario, CBS is suddenly turning a $1 million profit with no effort at all.

But what if “The Late Show” was actually losing money? Just to keep the math easy, we’ll say “The Late Show” was losing $1 million per year.

Suddenly, using my math, CBS’s income has gone up $2 million. You see my point; the actual numbers are likely much higher. CBS has turned a break-even proposition into a tidy profit.

CBS also can now, if they want to, liquidate the Ed Sullivan Theater and the attached office building. New York City assesses the property at $17 million; the real value is obviously more. Another asset to be monetized!

And because Stephen Colbert is no longer making jokes about people in the news, CBS has drastically lowered its legal risk of being sued. Standards & Practices no longer needs to closely review each show before broadcast. CBS’s corporate parent also no longer has to worry about the Tweeter-in-Chief becoming offended by one of Colbert’s jokes and attacking the company (possibly hurting its stock price) or sending the FCC out to challenge one of its owned-and-operated TV stations. Byron Allen isn’t going to offend anyone.


If you’re in charge of late-night programming, by cancelling Stephen Colbert, not only have you turned a small deficit into a modest profit, you’ve wiped a lot of other potential expenses off of your books.

Are you tanking your audience? Yes.

Are you hurting the network’s reputation? Yes.

Do you care about your audience or your reputation? No. You care about profits and share prices for the next quarter. In all fairness, network television is already in decline in the United States; you’re just accelerating the process in order to maximize your own revenue before CBS collapses and is worthless.

It’s as if you bought a historic building. You could fix it up and charge your tenants more rent. Or, you could wait until a tenant moves out, and then rip the copper and fixtures out and sell them for scrap. Eventually, all of the tenants will be gone and the building will be ruined, but you’re banking on the fact that you can cause a little bit of a damage over time and still make a profit without spending any of your own money. When the building is worthless, you can walk away, and it will be someone else’s problem. Probably your investors, the city taxpayers, and any banks that loaned you money.


At the same time that CBS is pulling the plug on its late-night show, it’s also killing the CBS Radio Network. Years ago, CBS Radio still had some talk shows and sports coverage; for the last few years, CBS Radio has only been a news service providing hourly updates. Still, the decision affects more than 700 radio stations, including KDKA in Pittsburgh and WMBS in Uniontown, which has been a CBS affiliate since 1941.

In announcing the decision to close the radio network, CBS cited “a shift in radio station programming strategies, coupled with challenging economic realities.” Does that mean CBS News was actually losing money on providing hourly newscasts (that seems doubtful, given that they were mostly repackaging audio already gathered by CBS News TV correspondents) or they simply don’t care?

I think it’s the latter; it’s just some more copper wiring in the walls that they can sell off. Reportedly, 26 unionized news reporters are being laid off. Just like eliminating Colbert’s show, that looks good in the quarterly and annual reports. If killing the CBS Radio Network makes the CBS News brand even less prominent, that’s too bad, but it’s not a current problem; it’s going to be someone else’s problem several years from now.

I mentioned the FCC. There was a time when radio and TV stations were required to run a certain minimum amount of news and public-service programming. There also was a time when radio and TV stations could only program a certain number of commercials per hour.

The federal government’s position was that the airwaves belonged to the American people, not to private companies. That’s why companies get a license to broadcast on AM, FM or TV; it’s like when you get a license to drive — you get permission to use the road, but you don’t own the road. Because the airwaves were owned by everyone, stations were required to broadcast in the “public interest, convenience and necessity.”


With broadcast deregulation in the 1990s under President Clinton, public-service and news requirements were scrapped and radio and TV stations were told “anything goes” as far as advertising content. That led directly to hour-long commercials and stations that broadcast nothing but paid programming, all day long.

Is anyone listening or watching? Not really, but there are always suckers willing to write a check to hear or see their message. Byron Allen will no doubt find more than enough advertisers willing to take a flyer on reaching 200,000 or 300,000 viewers in Colbert’s old time slot.

(In the Pittsburgh area, the worst offender may be WWCS Radio in Canonsburg, which currently runs 24-hour programming from “The Overcomer Ministry,” which was headed for decades by a preacher named Brother Stair. Brother Stair was a convicted rapist who died in 2021. I don’t know who is still donating to Brother Stair and who is paying the radio station, but he continues to drone into the atmosphere every day on 540 AM. And it’s all perfectly legal.)


All this is so much venting, and what’s the point? Nothing is going to change any time soon.

But I hope it goes some way toward explaining why Colbert is being replaced and the CBS Radio Network is being murdered after 99 years. It’s the usual suspects — a federal government that has given up on regulation and rapacious capitalism run amok. These are the same forces that have ruined your favorite stores and restaurants for the past two decades. A bunch of greasy weasels buy something and strip it down for parts, and then let the bankruptcy courts clean up the messes.

As Sal Tessio says to Tom Hagen in “The Godfather,” it’s just business. But the Corleones had a lot more dignity and self-respect than anyone in charge at CBS these days.